Today as I was scrolling through my reader I came across this video and post from Tobias Leenaert at the Vegan Strategist. It’s one of the best talks I’ve seen in the past few months on the topic of Veganism, especially as I’ve been trying to formulate and organize my thoughts on the next stage of my personal Veganism, which I now call Secular Veganism.
Source: Anti-vegan: the lasagne
Tobias makes several great points throughout the talk, but here are the ones that really struck me:
- practice slow opinion
- what goes into your mouth is less important than what comes out
- anger does not make you a better activist
- “winning an argument but losing a customer”
- guilt doesn’t help convert people to veganism
- take your thinking further than the accepted logic of the movement
I also loved the portion about whether we want a vegan club or a Vegan world. For me, the question relates back to what I wrote about a few days ago, with regard to whether you identify or qualify. Is Veganism a club that you can be accepted into/kicked out of based on ticking off items one-by-one from a litmus test-like check list, or does it have the potential to become something larger?
The AR movement has been around long enough now that you’d think we would have developed a more robust discourse for self-reflection and critique, but I rarely see it. In my experience, we have a lot of sacred cows at the core of Vegan ideology and attempts at critical thought quickly devolve into vegan-blaming.
We (Vegans) need to consider whether or not we have become a toxic culture, and what that means for the movement and for the animals.